RE: Target Size (Min)

Patrick wrote:
> Yes, the text should start and explain what the overall aim is (which is really 2), rather than start off suggesting it's about 1.

OK, well, it was something that the people on a recent call agreed to, so I'll have to see if we'd get objections the other way. It doesn't change the requirement, so it is a presentational aspect.

Chair hat off:
I think the overall objective is targets with sufficient size (1), so it is reasonable to start the SC that way. It also follows the format of other SCs like 2.5.4 & 2.5.5. 

Cheers,

-Alastair

Received on Thursday, 18 March 2021 10:16:26 UTC