- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 12:09:48 +0200
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKExBM+kYUYZO2sz16f6NqtWs5HdD6jQvz1kKv0e9uF4R9G2nA@mail.gmail.com>
Isn't it defined at set-of-web-pagesdef <https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/navigation-mechanisms-mult-loc.html#set-of-web-pagesdef> from SC *2.4.5 <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/#navigation-mechanisms-mult-loc> Multiple Ways?* I am not sure we can do a better job! Maybe Set a screen that are used to complete a process, such as filling out a form or learning about a product On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 5:19 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi Lisa, > > > > Sure, the latest version of the SC text and understanding is here: > > https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/findable-help.html > > > > The basic issue here though is that ‘set of web pages’ hasn’t been used in > this way before. How does a tester (or even the developer!) know whether a > page belongs to a particular set of web pages. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair > > > > > > *From:* Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> > *Sent:* 02 February 2021 14:54 > *To:* Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > *Cc:* WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: Findable help issues > > > > Hi Alistair > > Can we have a link to the current wording of the SC? > > It might make more sense to me then... > > All the best > > Lisa > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:47 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Last time we discussed Findable help, there were a couple of issues we > couldn’t answer: > > https://www.w3.org/2020/12/01-ag-minutes.html#item03 > > > > The resolution was to add some examples that try to answer the question. > In doing so, we should be able to work out if the SC text will be testable. > > The problem was that "Consistent Navigation" doesn't require that > navigation be shown on all pages in the set, only that where it does show, > it must show consistently. > > I think this does put us under a burden of proof to show, either through > examples or a definition update, how people can consistently identify > whether any page is part of a set. > > If that is too difficult, it might be a case for deferment because in > Silver the person claiming conformance defines the process/task/set. > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair > > > > -- > > > > @alastc / www.nomensa.com > > > >
Received on Thursday, 4 February 2021 10:10:40 UTC