- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:42:30 +0000
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2021 16:43:10 UTC
Sorry, that would have been helpful – 1 hour. Thanks, -Alastair From: Andrew Kirkpatrick Alastair – how long of a meeting? From: Alastair Campbell Hi everyone, In order to make progress on the WCAG 2.x backlog (including new issues on 2.2), we would like to run a dedicated meeting. It will be particularly productive if those active on the WCAG Github repo can attend. The structure of the meeting will be to: * Review un-assigned issues in github, aiming to assign a certain number of issues to the participants to tackle in the next two weeks. * Review the responses that people have added in the last week, aiming to agree or update them. * Identify issues which need a wider review during the main AG meeting. A key concern is transparency, so a requirement of the meetings is that any informative doc changes are properly logged and can be queried by any members not present. Any normative changes would trigger a full-group review and CFC. There is no perfect time we can run the meeting, so this survey is to identify the best possible time of the available options: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag2-backlog-meeting/ Kind regards, -Alastair -- @alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com>
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2021 16:43:10 UTC