Re: [External] WCAG 2.x backlog meetings

Alastair – how long of a meeting?

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 at 7:54 PM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: [External] WCAG 2.x backlog meetings
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 at 7:54 PM

Hi everyone,

In order to make progress on the WCAG 2.x backlog (including new issues on 2.2), we would like to run a dedicated meeting. It will be particularly productive if those active on the WCAG Github repo can attend.

The structure of the meeting will be to:


  *   Review un-assigned issues in github, aiming to assign a certain number of issues to the participants to tackle in the next two weeks.
  *   Review the responses that people have added in the last week, aiming to agree or update them.
  *   Identify issues which need a wider review during the main AG meeting.

A key concern is transparency, so a requirement of the meetings is that any informative doc changes are properly logged and can be queried by any members not present. Any normative changes would trigger a full-group review and CFC.

There is no perfect time we can run the meeting, so this survey is to identify the best possible time of the available options:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag2-backlog-meeting/


Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com>