- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:01:29 -0500
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOavpvd0cSu50NtRDbPNbQYqq93y3uWzieBRrmzEoCYNrziJeA@mail.gmail.com>
+1 to @awk. Kind regards, Laura On Fri, Aug 28, 2020, 3:50 PM Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: > Alastair, > > I agree with that but I worry that people lean too heavily on that > approach without really comparing the text and video versions and the SC > does also indicate that the video needs to be clearly identified as a media > alternative to the text. If this last bit isn’t done, then people won’t > know if or what they are missing, which is a problem for the user. > > > > IF the media really covers the content of the textual instructions AND the > video is labeled as an alternative to the text THEN 1.2.5 is met. > > > > Thanks, > > AWK > > > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > > Head of Accessibility > > Adobe > > > > akirkpat@adobe.com > > http://twitter.com/awkawk > > > > *From: *Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > *Date: *Friday, August 28, 2020 at 10:05 AM > *To: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject: *Audio Description requirement > *Resent-From: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Friday, August 28, 2020 at 10:04 AM > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > I’d like to check my assumptions for whether audio description is required > for a particular scenario. > > > > If you have a ‘support’ page, e.g. how to use the product I’ve just > bought, and it has both: > > - A pre-recorded video showing you how to use the product. > - Full & equivalent instructions on the same page. > > > > Is that required to have audio description at WCAG 2.1 AA? > > > > I’m leaning towards no, because: > > - 1.2.1 & 1.2.3 have “except when the audio or video is a media > alternative for text and is clearly labeled as such" > - 1.2.5 is scoped to the synchronized media > <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-synchronized-media> definition, > which includes: “unless the media is a media alternative for text that is > clearly labelled as such" > > > > So as long as the video is presented as an alternative to the text > content, it does not require audio description. > > > > Do others concur? > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair > > > > -- > > > > nomensa.com / @alastc > > >
Received on Friday, 28 August 2020 21:01:54 UTC