- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:33:46 -0400
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDbdDCY22SS-YMYV-3fsrhoGG53dZFGRbERAFoSMp2xj4w@mail.gmail.com>
I have a question about a paragraph, which might have a typo or slight error but I'm not sure. It's under the image with two checkboxes, one unfocused and one focused, under the heading "Relation to non-text color contrast" The image has an off grey background and a white interior of the checkbox. But the text says the background is white. Should it not say "light grey background" [image: image.png] The contrast of the default checkbox passes 1.4.11 because the dark border and ****white**** background have a contrast ratio greater than 3:1. The 2px dark blue focus outline passes Focus Appearance (Minimum) because the change of contrast is greater than 3:1 with the ***white*** background. The component as a whole maintains contrast with the white background so continues to pass 1.4.11. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613-806-9005 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:52 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > AG Working Group members, > > > > As we have received only positive feedback leading up to this CfC and no > responses indicating that group members could not live with this decision, > this CfC is agreed on as a consensus opinion of the working group. > > > > This decision will be recorded at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions > > > > > > *From:* Alastair Campbell > > > > Call For Consensus — ends 3rd August at midday Boston time. > > > > The Working Group has discussed several changes to “focus visible > (enhanced)”, including renaming the SC, adding a AAA variant, and dealing > with various issues. There is nothing new here, it is a roll-up of the > changes we’ve discussed over the last couple of months. > > > > The specific changes are detailed in this pull request: > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1121 > > > > Surveys: > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/focus-visible-enh-issues3/ > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/focus-visible-enh-issues2/ > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/focus-visible-enh-issues1/ > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before > the CfC deadline. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair >
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image.png
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2020 13:34:13 UTC