- From: Rachael Bradley Montgomery <rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 15:56:27 -0400
- To: Chuck Adams <charles.adams@oracle.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAL+jyYLv1cKn=cA9x6Kbd5Yng99nTOTFXNguMguSXgJ1yTgtbg@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, If you would like to try out the scoring and play with different examples, you can use the attached Excel Workbook. Please recognize this is all draft so that we can see how this might work and make adjustments. There are a number of variations on scoring and normalizing in the workbook once you've filled out the atomic test results. It should be JAWS accessible. If you have problems or find errors, please let me know and I will make adjustments and send out an updated version. Best regards, Rachael On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:13 PM Chuck Adams <charles.adams@oracle.com> wrote: > The purpose of this email is to call attention to the survey: COMMENTS > AND CRITIQUES FOR SILVER CONFORMANCE MODEL - 3 TYPES OF TESTING PRESENTED > BY RACHAEL > <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/2020-07-Rachael-SCM-Review/>. > Comments provided through this survey will guide the August 11th deep > dive into the various conformance model alternatives. > > > > Please review the survey and provide your feedback. > > > > Regards, > > Charles Adams > -- Rachael Montgomery, PhD Director, Accessible Community rachael@accessiblecommunity.org "I will paint this day with laughter; I will frame this night in song." - Og Mandino
Attachments
- application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet attachment: Test_Template_28_July.xlsx
Received on Thursday, 30 July 2020 19:56:57 UTC