- From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 01:08:16 +0000
- To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DM6PR03MB41061968C73CAB1B4D8422D0F16D0@DM6PR03MB4106.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
My recommendation is to have multiple ways to reach: * Keystroke * Semantic role such as region where screen reader users could navigate to and also understand bounds * Skip to link on page such as at the top so the user can quickly jump to it and also make it’s presence known Jonathan From: Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 5:55 PM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Floating Action Buttons CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Everyone-- I've been asked if there is a way to implement accessible floating action buttons (FAB) as in Google Material Design. An example would be a floating map button that provides directions. Another would be a floating link that takes the user to the top of a page (leaving aside the potential confusion if it is styled like a button). There are pros and cons to using them, but it would seem to be a problem wrt accessibility. In particular, how would a keyboard or screen reader user navigate to an object without a fixed location? I thought of accesskeys, but their use is frowned on because of potential conflicts with shortcut keys. Having an FAB appear after a number of keystrokes, time, or sentences sounds intrusive and arbitrary. Putting them in a fixed position on a page seems to defeat their purpose. I also thought of claiming equivalence if there is an existing keystroke that accomplishes the same thing, but that doesn't feel right. Am I missing something? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Mike Elledge
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2020 01:08:32 UTC