Re: WCAG 2.2 status update

Hey Alastair,
I have a few outstanding concerns with the approved SCs. I think another
survey round would be appropriate, since they have all been updated since
they were last surveyed.

Wilco


On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 6:00 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> This is hopefully the final status update for the WCAG 2.2 as pre-approved
> drafts, after this we’ll be dealing with CFCs and github comments.
>
>
>
> We have two which appear to be pretty much ready but we need approval, up
> on Tuesday:
>
>
>
>    - *Touch target spacing: *We updated that in the meeting on Wednesday,
>    but the Mobile TF suggested some updates:
>
>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sszSUKB8t3VuRzxHtOjLfQZjNYCw-xr_EbuMwW7WiGc/edit#heading=h.7sa7n7yr2ykk
>
>    - *Visual Indicators (to progress):* Has been updated, re-review
>    needed:
>
>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WhZAbswvPHs7A3stfqM_ATsaBHPeGbHtARcmaKMck1U/edit
>    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WhZAbswvPHs7A3stfqM_ATsaBHPeGbHtARcmaKMck1U/edit#heading=h.y476ttrsa0b5>
>
>
>
> We have a few which are approved from an SC point of view, pending updates
> to the understanding/technique documents:
>
>
>
>    - *Hidden controls:* Approved (in meeting) SC:
>    https://www.w3.org/2020/02/11-ag-minutes.html#item02
>    New technique to approve.
>    - *Find help*: Approved (in meeting) the SC:
>    https://www.w3.org/2020/03/17-ag-minutes.html#item05
>    Needs a fleshed out technique.
>    - *Fixed Reference Points: *Approved (in meeting) the SC:
>    https://www.w3.org/2020/03/25-ag-minutes.html#item04
>    Has an updated technique.
>    - *Error correction (Processes):* Approved (in meeting) the SC:
>    https://www.w3.org/2020/03/25-ag-minutes.html#item03
>    Needs a fleshed out technique.
>
> Please do review the above and comment in the documents if you have
> editorial suggestions.
>
> We are creating pull requests prior to CFC for:
>
>
>    -
> *Information in steps *Note – we approved a definition for “steps” that
>    will be applied to this SC as well.
>    - *Dragging*
>
> *SCs that hit problems:*
>
>    - *Icon Description*: Was reviewed on the 7th Jan:
>    https://www.w3.org/2020/01/07-ag-minutes.html#item06
>    There does not seem to be a good way of achieving this on touch-screen
>    devices, in a way that doesn’t make the interaction worse in some
>    circumstances.
>    - *Visible labels* & *Orientation:* were thought to be possible to
>    cover with understanding/technique updates.
>    - *Custom interactions: *It is really difficult to define what a
>    ‘custom interaction’ actually is. A lot of the problematic ones are
>    ‘standard interactions’ (e.g. swipe gesture) but with an unexpected result.
>    This is deferred, more research needed.
>    https://www.w3.org/2020/03/24-ag-minutes.html#item01
>
>
> *SCs approved:*
>
>    - *Accessible authentication:* CFCed and ready to merge:
>    https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1037
>    - *Focus visible (enhanced):* Part of FPWD.
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
> --
>
> www.nomensa.com / @alastc
>


-- 
*Wilco Fiers*
Axe for Web product owner - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair ACT-R