On 23/02/2020 22:55, Wayne Dick wrote: [...] > I suppose we didn’t make it Level A because we didn’t think it could be > met so easily. It can. I would say this is heavily dependent on the type of site. Functionality- and information-dense sites, particularly complex web applications, will have more trouble making a working/workable version at 320 CSS px width. It is not just the technology side that matters - as yes, technologies like responsive/adaptive web design are now fairly mature ... but it can be a challenge actually having to rethink how complex content and interactions can be made available in small-sized viewport. And as most companies/sites (at least in my auditing experience) target a base of WCAG AA, changing the SC to A won't make that much of a difference in practice (and sites/applications that actively choose to ignore it for AA will likewise ignore it if it was A). P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_laukeReceived on Sunday, 23 February 2020 23:54:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:34 UTC