Re: SC 2.2.1 Extend (NOT Adjust!!) (Re: SC 2.2.1 Extend "at least ten times")

I'm fine with it.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613-806-9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>


On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 6:00 AM Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
wrote:

> On 06/02/2020 18:57, John Foliot wrote:
> > +1 to Patrick - if it's not a normative change but just an editorial
> > adjustment for more clarity, then by all means let's do it.
> >
> > (I do agree with David and Katie as to intent, but see from Makoto's
> > question the ongoing lack of clarity)
>
> Took a first stab at this https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1040
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>