- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:00:29 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I still have reservations about the precise wording of the new SC - as the last about contrast or thickness, even combined with the note that follows, is both hard to parse and seems to leave a gap for when the focus indication area is exactly the minimum (i.e. not "larger than the minimum" meaning the note itself may not actually apply to it), and it's 2 CSS px wide, but has a contrast lower than 3:1 ... but +1 for at least moving to FPWD and to see if I'm just the only one that has some problem with the contortions in those wordings. P On 04/02/2020 14:46, Alastair Campbell wrote: > Call For Consensus - ends Thursday 6th February at 11am Boston time. > > > > This call is to approve the publication of WCAG 2.2 as the First Public Working Draft. > > > > The current draft is available here: > > https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/ > > > > The approach for WCAG 2.2 is to add only the items that have been agreed, and so far the Working Group has agreed to include Focus Visible (Enhanced) to the WCAG 2.2 working draft: > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2020JanMar/0000.html > > > > Future decisions / CFCs would add more to the working draft, but this CFC is about permission to publish this first version. > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you "not being able to live with" this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline. > > Kind regards, > > -Alastair > > -- > > www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com/> / @alastc > -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2020 10:00:37 UTC