Re: CFC - Publish COGA's Content Usable for Wide Review

+1 to publish


Jan McSorley

VP, Accessibility

Psychometrics and Testing Services


400 Center Ridge Drive, Suite F

Austin, TX  78753

M - (512) 673-9569

Twitter: @Jan_McSorley

Skype:  jan.mcsorley

www.linkedin.com/in/janmcsorley<http://www.linkedin.com/in/janmcsorley>


[Pearson]


Learn more at pearson.com<http://pearson.com/>


We put a man on the moon in the 1960's. Surely we can make information technology fully accessible to people with disabilities.  It can be done. It must be done. It will be done!

________________________________
From: Charles Hall <hallmediamobile@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 3:51 PM
To: Rachael Bradley Montgomery <rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: CFC - Publish COGA's Content Usable for Wide Review

+1

Charles Hall

Invited Expert, W3C AGWG & Silver TF
Chair, W3C IDIW CG
Member, Ferndale Accessibility & Inclusion Advisory Commission

On Jun 23, 2020, at 8:39 PM, Rachael Bradley Montgomery <rachael@accessiblecommunity.org<mailto:rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>> wrote:

Call For Consensus: Ends Monday June 29 at 11:59 Boston time.



The AG Working Group has discussed moving forward with a wide review of Making content usable for people with cognitive and learning disabilities<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__w3c.github.io_coga_content-2Dusable_&d=DwMFaQ&c=0YLnzTkWOdJlub_y7qAx8Q&r=ksuXVmJb3l3QDSARdyyNqYB9mIN46ysrp3N8eQ8CENY&m=Xk73IFmCFj3s21C8luEJlx1WDpH6p_op_rBAhGGDyyo&s=RwOOy93RZ91wGvMU2kI8oakj_wtHwoPA_d7ZtejbqqU&e=>

The version that will go out is at:  https://w3c.github.io/coga/content-usable/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__w3c.github.io_coga_content-2Dusable_&d=DwMFaQ&c=0YLnzTkWOdJlub_y7qAx8Q&r=ksuXVmJb3l3QDSARdyyNqYB9mIN46ysrp3N8eQ8CENY&m=Xk73IFmCFj3s21C8luEJlx1WDpH6p_op_rBAhGGDyyo&s=RwOOy93RZ91wGvMU2kI8oakj_wtHwoPA_d7ZtejbqqU&e=>



Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2020/06/23-ag-minutes.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_2020_06_23-2Dag-2Dminutes.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=0YLnzTkWOdJlub_y7qAx8Q&r=ksuXVmJb3l3QDSARdyyNqYB9mIN46ysrp3N8eQ8CENY&m=Xk73IFmCFj3s21C8luEJlx1WDpH6p_op_rBAhGGDyyo&s=bRjS0kjQrjdQ_FsysL4wWixpMaEetzARbqJHavAfpTs&e=>



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please vote No and put your reason or the changes you want to see in the comments field.

Both APA and AG are holding a Call For Consensus for this topic.  If you are a member of both groups, please respond to both CFCs.
Kind regards,

Rachael