Re: CFC - Publish COGA's Content Usable for Wide Review

+1

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613-806-9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>


On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:08 AM James A. <A.James@soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> Abi James
>
>
>
> *From:* Rachael Bradley Montgomery <rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>
> *Sent:* 24 June 2020 01:40
> *To:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* CFC - Publish COGA's Content Usable for Wide Review
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus: Ends Monday June 29 at 11:59 Boston time.
>
>
>
> The AG Working Group has discussed moving forward with a wide review of Making
> content usable for people with cognitive and learning disabilities
> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fcoga%2Fcontent-usable%2F&data=01%7C01%7Ca.james%40soton.ac.uk%7Cd218f54745254f1d865208d817d739f7%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=B1jbEepjRffdWspo09teizeHlRTpfLNs5JkEOztrnhE%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> The version that will go out is at:
> https://w3c.github.io/coga/content-usable/
> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fcoga%2Fcontent-usable%2F&data=01%7C01%7Ca.james%40soton.ac.uk%7Cd218f54745254f1d865208d817d739f7%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=B1jbEepjRffdWspo09teizeHlRTpfLNs5JkEOztrnhE%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2020/06/23-ag-minutes.html
> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2020%2F06%2F23-ag-minutes.html&data=01%7C01%7Ca.james%40soton.ac.uk%7Cd218f54745254f1d865208d817d739f7%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=s2n6vpAOiwetnAbGrkkxOODTj%2BCjoDP4u9adrsFD52Y%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please vote No and put your reason
> or the changes you want to see in the comments field.
>
> Both APA and AG are holding a Call For Consensus for this topic.  If you
> are a member of both groups, please respond to both CFCs.
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Rachael
>
>
>