- From: jake abma <jake.abma@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 15:47:14 +0200
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: Charles Hall <hallmediamobile@gmail.com>, WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 13:47:38 UTC
Works and worked for me, comment came from a 'real live' non-native UX person at my work who knows a bit of CSS. I understand the confusion and this might happen more in the wild. It got us in an awkward conversation to start with before we understood each other well and where the misunderstanding came from. Op do 11 jun. 2020 om 13:47 schreef Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com >: > Hi Charles, Jake, > > > > It is helpful that the CSS definition of border happens to only work for > the complete perimeter, but we shouldn’t rely on a technology-specific. > > > > Chair-hat-off, I think the current text says what we want in English terms: > > “The focus indication area is greater than or equal to a 1 CSS pixel > border of the focused control." (Apart from “CSS pixel” which is defined.) > > > > *If* we did find more people confused by “border”, I’d update my > suggestion to: > > “The focus indication area is greater than or equal to a 1 CSS pixel line > around the focused control’s perimeter." > > > > But, to me: “line around the perimeter” = “border”. > > > > And “border” is less words! > > > > -Alastair > > >
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 13:47:38 UTC