- From: jake abma <jake.abma@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 12:23:32 +0200
- To: WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 10:23:55 UTC
the exact last comment was: "Nee, de border is de border. De omtrek is de circumference. De lengte van de border is de omtrek. Maar in CSS beschrijf je de dikte van de border, dus de omtrek is irrelevant." translated as: "No, the border is the border. The circumference is the circumference. The length of the border is the circumference. But in CSS you describe the thickness of the border, so the perimeter is irrelevant." Op do 11 jun. 2020 om 12:19 schreef jake abma <jake.abma@gmail.com>: > Hi Alastair / all, > > Today I got some interesting feedback on the first criteria for focus > enhanced. > > *- Minimum area: The focus indication area is greater than or equal to a > 1 CSS pixel border of the focused control.* > > This was interpreted as the CSS border property width (1px), and not the > "circumference". > > So when you have a button of 120 x 40 px, a border-right of 1 CSS px would > be fine. > > button:focus { > border-right: 1px solid black; > } > > IF, as I understood it, the circumference is ment, we probably need / want > to change it. > > Cheers, > Jake > >
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 10:23:55 UTC