- From: David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 02:38:39 +0000
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <FA1E7981-962E-449D-A5ED-95750D9D56F7@helixopp.com>
+1 to Andrew’s comment. From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 6:06 PM To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: Re: Pre-CFC - Redundant entry Resent-From: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Resent-Date: Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 6:06 PM I don’t understand why “steps in a process” is a “set of controls to achieve particular user-actions” – that doesn’t’ square with the definition of process. Process: series of user actions where each action is required in order to complete an activity Why isn’t “step in a process”: A single user action in a series which is required to complete an activity Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Head of Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 at 11:27 AM To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: RE: Pre-CFC - Redundant entry Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Resent-Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 at 11:26 AM Hi Wilco & everyone, This conversation stalled a bit, is this definition for ‘steps in a process’ ok? Added here: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1046/commits/80dea318ef8c6f65b66d2022fbb06005a5ca74c0 If so, we can go to CFC on this one. Cheers, -Alastair From: Alastair Campbell - "user-actions presented": I don't think a "user action" is something that can be "presented", you can present content that users can interact with, but I don't think you can actually present the action itself Yea, I wasn’t happy with that, but I was trying to keep fairly close to the process definition we have. User actions are the things done as part of a process… still thinking about that. - "presented separately": this can mean a number of things. Form controls in a fieldset can be said to be "presented separately", but that doesn't seem to be the intended meaning When we discussed it on a call, the main thing was that you had to navigate between steps. That doesn’t mean just page by page, but we wanted to include accordion type forms as well. How about: “Step a in a process: a set of user-interface controls to achieve particular user-actions, where navigation is required to reach another set of user-interface controls in the same process" Cheers, -Alastair
Received on Friday, 29 May 2020 02:38:57 UTC