Visual indicators

HI All

At the end of the meeting today, I described the history of the visual
indicators SC and how we are on the edge of the consensus couple of weeks
ago and then splintered out into numerous iterations.  It sounds like there
was just a misunderstanding about this previous version and COGA appears to
be in agreement with the language.

I've made a clean copy and have updated the understanding document. Of
course there would be discussion about exemptions in the definition of
process but I think were pretty close to something that is tight enough
that authors would know when it applies and when it doesn't apply.

Lisa will be getting some additional examples this week to build out the
understanding a little bit further. I think the text in this version is
something that we may be able to rally around and get consensus.
Understanding that we would want to go further once personalization is
mature which would be in the next major version of WCAG.

I've made a copy of the previous versions and we have a full archive of all
comments and discussions and versions leading up to this point for anybody
who wants them.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WhZAbswvPHs7A3stfqM_ATsaBHPeGbHtARcmaKMck1U/edit?usp=sharing

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Mobile:  613.806.9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>