Re: WCAG 2.2 COGA SC Persistent Labels Ready For Review Edits

Hi Alastair

Ohh...  I thought the persistent label idea was scoped for a stepped based
process.

Sure we can separate them out... then I'd probably reword the proposal for
persistent labels to something like this

         A mechanism is available to visually display labels or
instructions for all instances of a user interface component that
collects information
from the user.

Regarding

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613-806-9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>


On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 5:06 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Hi David (F),
>
>
>
> I think it was just that the old text is still at the top, labelled “Text
> aimed at WCAG 2.2”, so people took that as the intended text.
>
>
>
> When we go through an iteration and agree a change, it helps to remove
> that and just present the latest text. (Maybe putting the old version in a
> section at the bottom under an ‘archive’ heading or something.)
>
>
>
> David M – I think the scoping is odd when they are combined, as part of it
> is for multi-step processes, and the label part is per-label.
>
>
>
> I think the preferred persistent-label text from TPAC was:
>
> *Persistent labels:* Inputs with labels or instructions display the
> labels or instructions at all times.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* David Fazio
>
>
>
> Thanks, David. I do like your more polished version. Question though: are
> you suggesting we include both information in steps and persistent labels
> all in one SC?  Or should we keep them separate?
>
> This message was Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse any typographic
> errors.
>
>
> On Nov 13, 2019, at 11:57 AM, EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Thank you so much David and I liked the breakdown of the main points.
>
>
>
> Here is a paper that might be useful for the coga group as it mentions
> forms
>
> "Web Page Design Recommendations for People with Down Syndrome Based on
> Users’ Experiences" (Oct 2018)
>
> https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/11/4047
>
>
>
> Best wishes
>
> E.A.
>
>
>
> Mrs E.A. Draffan
>
> WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton
>
> Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103
>
> http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk
> <https://www.outlook.soton.ac.uk/owa/redir.aspx?C=69b1RzNTDwem3wbm4pLRmuYfTLt16YjcghtEpZBsF5Sebx78I2DUCA..&URL=http%3a%2f%2faccess.ecs.soton.ac.uk%2f>
>
>
>
> *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca
> <david100@sympatico.ca>]
> *Sent:* 13 November 2019 17:44
> *To:* David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com>
> *Cc:* EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>; lwatson@tetralogical.com;
> w3c-wai-gl@w3.org; public-cognitive-a11y-tf <
> public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: WCAG 2.2 COGA SC Persistent Labels Ready For Review Edits
>
>
>
> Hi All
>
>
>
> In the Google doc I made an attempt at writing the SC using WCAG defined
> terms, including the "Conformance Requirement #3 on "steps in a process".
> Here it is below for convenience.
>
>
>
> For user interface components
> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG21%2F%23dfn-user-interface-components&data=01%7C01%7Cead%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C00ea83431edb4468b77d08d76861132a%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=7%2B6oNFxLdvRO3J0nQrM7SmyCKc60Rr7ggQFUDyiQ1j8%3D&reserved=0>
> that collect information from the user, and which are part of a process
> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG21%2F%23dfn-processes&data=01%7C01%7Cead%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C00ea83431edb4468b77d08d76861132a%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=G6bg0yQNk6MIpi0MyYJrbFLbLK7nHepkpykS4tDw2%2Fc%3D&reserved=0>
> (i.e., a sequence of steps that need to be completed in order to accomplish
> an activity), the following are true:
>
>    1. Information entered by the user remains available to the user
>    throughout the entire process.
>    2. Subsequent instances of completed fields are auto-populated, unless
>    re-entry is essential
>    <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG21%2F%23dfn-essential&data=01%7C01%7Cead%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C00ea83431edb4468b77d08d76861132a%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=CEt0DzaQUyRe5Fkfvv0rNdSQ73XvmFhP%2FvjTM5OyJJI%3D&reserved=0>
>    .
>    3. Labels or instructions are available throughout the process.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613-806-9005
>
> LinkedIn
>
> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fdavidmacdonald100&data=01%7C01%7Cead%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C00ea83431edb4468b77d08d76861132a%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=s%2BR%2B8uAahJlxW63hK9krgR7JCuNTzWQW1Vqs%2BOdhcRQ%3D&reserved=0>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fdavidmacd&data=01%7C01%7Cead%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C00ea83431edb4468b77d08d76861132a%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=T8m9Yz1%2FmnbNZtu3HeeXe4%2FUXhHINp8Lhu40gDzOnm0%3D&reserved=0>
>
> GitHub
> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FDavidMacDonald&data=01%7C01%7Cead%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C00ea83431edb4468b77d08d76861132a%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=%2FTocFnEKdZymr9KyKIIewoG%2B8B3umhD3lHxYFN5XEXQ%3D&reserved=0>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com
> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.can-adapt.com%2F&data=01%7C01%7Cead%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C00ea83431edb4468b77d08d76861132a%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=u2UEm0cFd12rD3W7BvbaUaivvpypFAXr4OkYkggnjjI%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
>
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidmacd.com%2Fdisclaimer.html&data=01%7C01%7Cead%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C00ea83431edb4468b77d08d76861132a%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=j%2BfII7JVuoXIQXAy5XHDrjaFs33t478qFp0030W8w08%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 3:55 PM David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com> wrote:
>
> Oops. I didn't attach the doc earlier. Here it is
>
> On 11/11/19, 12:54 PM, "David Fazio" <dfazio@helixopp.com> wrote:
>
>     Attached is a Word Doc draft of proposed COGA success criteria
> Persistent Labels. It begins on page 8 of the Word Doc. As with Information
> In Steps, I kept everything in one document so everyone could see the
> evolution of the split. If you want to review, and edit, via Google Docs it
> begins on page 9. You can access the draft at this link:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e46eqQnVYqdSyqo29pyJoY1QynRH9v95YW8soTTbfsU/edit?ts=5d846669
> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1e46eqQnVYqdSyqo29pyJoY1QynRH9v95YW8soTTbfsU%2Fedit%3Fts%3D5d846669&data=01%7C01%7Cead%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C00ea83431edb4468b77d08d76861132a%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=nBZjhjhDEL4Nuq0VzRW3Vdigbt4IbeAcAef7vEKva%2Bo%3D&reserved=0>
> .
>
>     All comments, and recommendations are welcome.
>
>
>     On 11/10/19, 12:37 PM, "David Fazio" <dfazio@helixopp.com> wrote:
>
>         Thank you for the review, and edits, EA. I just implemented them.
> Information in Steps should be ready to go. I will finish up Persistent
> Labels later today, and send it out in the same document
>
>         On 11/5/19, 5:47 AM, "EA Draffan" <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>             Thanks so much David and I am returning the document with a
> few queries and I have to admit that I found the alternative easier to
> understand.
>             That is
>             "Information provided to or obtained from a user in a
> multi-step process does not need to be re-entered in a subsequent step
> unless re-entry is essential [or required to ensure the security of the
> content)"
>
>             Best wishes
>             E.A.
>
>             Mrs E.A. Draffan
>             WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton
>             Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103
>             http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk
>
>
>             -----Original Message-----
>             From: David Fazio [mailto:dfazio@helixopp.com]
>             Sent: 03 November 2019 21:26
>             To: lwatson@tetralogical.com; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org;
> public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
>             Subject: Re: WCAG 2.2 COGA SC Information in Steps Ready For
> Review Edits
>
>             For everyone that prefers to review this S.C. in a word doc, I
> made some edits to the Understanding Document online. Here is the revised
> Word Doc.
>
>             On 11/3/19, 12:04 PM, "David Fazio" <dfazio@helixopp.com>
> wrote:
>
>                 Sure thing. I've attached the word doc
>
>                 On 11/3/19, 11:56 AM, "Léonie Watson" <
> lwatson@tetralogical.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>