Re: Proposed amendment to 1.4.11 for WCAG 2.2

+1

Abi James

Sent from my iPhone

On 21 Oct 2019, at 10:22, Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> wrote:


Hey Alastair,
+1 on doing this as a WCAG 2.1 errata. I also propose adding an "Errata" heading to the understanding document, and possibly an errata appendix to 2.1, so that this is transparent.

W

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:48 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>> wrote:
Hi Wilco,

Back in this thread, if it were proposed as an errata to 2.1 (thus updating 2.2 as well), would that be a +1 or neutral for you?

I.e. on the substance of the change/ clarification.

-Alastair

From: Wilco Fiers

-1 to this and any other change changing existing success criteria.


--
Wilco Fiers
Axe for Web product owner - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair ACT-R
[cid:BCBD7D4B-677E-4B95-AE3F-60005DBD9EE4]
<deque_logo_180p.gif>