Hey Alastair,
+1 on doing this as a WCAG 2.1 errata. I also propose adding an "Errata"
heading to the understanding document, and possibly an errata appendix to
2.1, so that this is transparent.
W
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:48 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:
> Hi Wilco,
>
>
>
> Back in this thread, if it were proposed as an errata to 2.1 (thus
> updating 2.2 as well), would that be a +1 or neutral for you?
>
>
>
> I.e. on the substance of the change/ clarification.
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> *From: *Wilco Fiers
>
>
>
> -1 to this and any other change changing existing success criteria.
>
--
*Wilco Fiers*
Axe for Web product owner - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair ACT-R
