Re: 4.1.1 depreciation discussion

+1

Thanks for the research. I guess depreciation is never an easy thing.

Steve

On 20/09/2019 17:49, David MacDonald wrote:
> Hi All
> 
> Congratulations to all who made the long trip to Japan and those who 
> stayed up to attend online... I  hope that everyone from North America 
> gets a quick restoration of their circadian rhythms.
> 
> I had proposed to remove 4.1.1 and point to 1.3.1 and 4.1.2 to cover the 
> same issues.  Wilco researched it and it got a good airing on Github.
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/770
> 
> I also tweeted out a survey. 
> https://twitter.com/davidmacd/status/1172603177654530054
> 
> It appears form both the Github thread and the survey, that support to 
> remove it is around 48% on 33 votes, and 52% for keeping it.
> 
> I think based on the Github discussion, this survey,and emails, that I 
> should withdraw the proposal, because historically, new actions on the 
> standard should have broad support, not moderate support.
> 
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
> 
> *Can**Adapt**Solutions Inc.*
> 
> Tel:  613-806-9005
> 
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
> 
> twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd>
> 
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
> 
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
> 
> /  Adapting the web to *all* users/
> 
> /            Including those with disabilities/
> 
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy 
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

Received on Monday, 23 September 2019 10:32:10 UTC