Re: 4.1.1 depreciation discussion

+1

JF

(Sent from my mobile, apologies for any spelling mistakes)

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019, 12:51 PM David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> Hi All
>
> Congratulations to all who made the long trip to Japan and those who
> stayed up to attend online... I  hope that everyone from North America gets
> a quick restoration of their circadian rhythms.
>
> I had proposed to remove 4.1.1 and point to 1.3.1 and 4.1.2 to cover the
> same issues.  Wilco researched it and it got a good airing on Github.
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/770
>
> I also tweeted out a survey.
> https://twitter.com/davidmacd/status/1172603177654530054
>
> It appears form both the Github thread and the survey, that support to
> remove it is around 48% on 33 votes, and 52% for keeping it.
>
> I think based on the Github discussion, this survey,and emails, that I
> should withdraw the proposal, because historically, new actions on the
> standard should have broad support, not moderate support.
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613-806-9005
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>