Re: WCAG 2.2 SC Do Not Rely On User Memory Draft

I added in a reference to 3.3.2 Labels of Instructions. I don't think we should omit it just because it constitutes a failure of another S.C. The reason being is that this gives "cause" to users with cognitive disabilities. "Cause" is a legal standard that must be met, demonstrating that an individual has been harmed, in order to bring forth a lawsuit. A user who is not blind, and does not rely on braille cannot sue a compant for not providing braille materials, because that does not harm them. Although it would harm a person that is blind.
On 8/23/19, 9:00 AM, "David Fazio" <dfazio@helixopp.com> wrote:

    Yes, placeholder text is what I was referring to 
    
    This message was Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse any typographic errors. 
    
    > On Aug 23, 2019, at 8:54 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:
    > 
    >> On 23/08/2019 16:41, David Fazio wrote:
    >> Good morning, everyone. Anyone interested in contributing to the proposed S.C. “Do Not Rely On User Memory” please take a look at what we have so far, comment, propose edits, and help us set it up for TPAC in the next couple of weeks. This is my very first experience working on an S.C. so any, and all, contributions are greatly appreciated.
    >> : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e46eqQnVYqdSyqo29pyJoY1QynRH9v95YW8soTTbfsU/edit?usp=sharing

    > 
    > Skimming over this briefly:
    > 
    > - in technique 1, it's unclear what "embossed sample text" is/means. placeholder text?
    > 
    > - "or labels placed within form fields that disappear when a user activates them" this would already be a failure of 3.3.2 Labels of Instructions
    > 
    > P
    > -- 
    > Patrick H. Lauke
    > 
    > www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke

    > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com

    > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
    >

Received on Friday, 23 August 2019 16:32:28 UTC