- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 10:05:26 -0800
- To: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Cc: Joshue O Connor - InterAccess <josh@interaccess.ie>, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJeQ8SCazf+z_i_SO2mLo+NBSpVwPAvwoit1ExN7pUs+SprWuA@mail.gmail.com>
It certainly would be nice to enable young students of computer science with low vision to read code examples in books. Each time I read an O'Reilly book I have to cut out the code and pull it into an IDE with word wrapping. It is a very slow process. There seems to be no standards for formatting PRE content. Each publisher tends to have a format, but there are no standards that would permit reliable parsing. Best, Wayne On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 9:49 AM John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> wrote: > ...and this is why I so dislike Failure Techniques... > > > I'm guessing the failure per se is the use of preformatted text, > > > We cannot do this or say this as broadly as that. There are many instances > where pre-formatted text would be required (the most common use-case being > poetry). > > Haiku: > > The summer river: > although there is a bridge, my horse > goes through the water. > > Example of a Robert Service > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_W._Service> poem > <https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/45081/the-cremation-of-sam-mcgee>: > > On a Christmas Day we were mushing our way over the Dawson trail. > Talk of your cold! through the parka's fold it stabbed like a driven nail. > If our eyes we'd close, then the lashes froze till sometimes we couldn't > see; > It wasn't much fun, but the only one to whimper was Sam McGee. > > In these examples, the formatting of the text also conveys the Pentameter > <https://literarydevices.net/pentameter/>of the rhymes/poems. Conveying > this critical literary device is wholly dependent on the formatting of the > text. > > JF > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:33 AM Joshue O Connor - InterAccess < > josh@interaccess.ie> wrote: > >> Patrick H. Lauke wrote: >> >> On 29/01/2019 14:30, Joshue O Connor - InterAccess wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is there any progress on the potential Failure "Using preformatted text >> or excluding preformatting text as an exception to no two dimensional >> scrolling". [1] >> >> I find this really difficult to parse - can anyone explain the thinking >> behind this one to me please? >> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/reflow.html >> >> >> I'm guessing the failure per se is the use of preformatted text, with the >> addition of wrongly thinking that it might be something that's valid to >> exclude as being required to reflow? And that in the end, the failure will >> be retitled to just "Using preformatted text" with a clear indication in >> the prose of the failure that no, it doesn't count automatically as an >> exemption? >> >> Go you.. I'm still confused but somewhat reassured that someone I know >> does understand it :-) >> >> >> P >> >> >> >> -- >> Joshue O Connor >> Director | InterAccess.ie >> > > > -- > *​John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC > Representative > Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good > deque.com > >
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2019 18:06:24 UTC