Closing old issues

Hi everyone,

I’ve been reviewing old issues, trying to get that large number down.

Anything substantial is going through our process (i.e. a survey), but there are quite a few I’m shutting down because they are either not applicable (i.e. only appear in old WCAG 2.0 resources we’re aiming to replace/redirect), or it’s a typo in a technique I can sort out quickly, or a non-issue.

For transparency, here’s a list of recently closed issues that haven’t been through a survey:

  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/294 (typo in consistent navigation)
  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/290 (non-issue)
  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/287 (ARIA1 typp)
  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/285 (SCR38 non-issue)
  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/283 (F77 minor text update)
  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/281 (F24 typo)
  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/299 (Old docs only)
  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/274 (H4 non-issue)
  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/271 (C20 non-enough of an issue)
  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/266 (not our issue)
  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/251 (fixed in ARIA)
  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/234 (fixed by 2.1 updates)
  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/198 (topic of discussion)
  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/155 (response of ‘leave as is’ not queried)
  *   https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/126 (a technique from the wiki)

Feel free to dig through, re-open if you disagree.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com/> / @alastc