RE: Minutes 9 April 2019

Thanks Jonathan, that is a good catch!
I have made that change and adjusted the corresponding tally count.
FWIW, I did not include 2.1 SC in the tally count because I found that I was much less confident about my ratings for those SC.
--
Top posted for my convenience.

From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 10:58 AM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Minutes 9 April 2019

Thanks for putting this together Bruce.  I'd say SC 1.4.1 is not invisible because it isn't just about providing behind the scenes alternatives for use of color - but visible alternatives to color for folks with color perception conditions who can see.

Jonathan

From: Bruce Bailey <Bailey@Access-Board.gov<mailto:Bailey@Access-Board.gov>>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 3:16 PM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: Minutes 9 April 2019

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

On the call, I volunteered to update the tally of SC as being Essential, Easy, and/or Invisible.

I have completed a first pass on that which you can find in the wiki here:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.x_Priority_levels_discussion<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FWCAG_2.x_Priority_levels_discussion&data=02%7C01%7Cbailey%40access-board.gov%7C6f2f353abfdd479fd2b108d6c1b2faae%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C0%7C636909371786154460&sdata=1R%2BSb%2FhRKFpUG4FS6IJ6R0CQzQoP%2Fw8p4uvNlt5wiu4%3D&reserved=0>

Feedback is much appreciated.  I think I addressed the questions and concerns raised by JF and Glenda on the survey.