- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:12:30 +0000
- To: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>
- CC: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 14 December 2018 11:12:55 UTC
> I do not think we will can consensus that this is currently covered in 2.1, as per the current language. Hi Michael, You could be right, the definition of states covers states that have “data associated” and “user interaction possibilities”. In hindsight it would have been useful to separate those. If others agree, then I suggest we include advisory techniques, and a note that those aspects are likely to be covered in a future version. -Alastair
Received on Friday, 14 December 2018 11:12:55 UTC