RE: Silver Links for TPAC

Can I add my thanks as well.  These links to 'Plain Language' really help those of us who are not so technically minded but need to know about all the issues.

One point that came up in a discussion today was the need to be able to include real examples of more complex coding techniques that are developed in between the WCAG updates.  Perhaps a place where these can be tested and accepted as good examples especially around the use of ARIA for example.

Drop downs https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-practices/examples/listbox/listbox-collapsible.html

compared to https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.0/components/dropdowns/


Also React JS examples where ongoing issues need to be addressed and it is hard to gain consensus as to the best technique, but bona fide guidance is needed.

Best wishes
E.A.

Mrs E.A. Draffan
WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton
Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103
http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk<https://www.outlook.soton.ac.uk/owa/redir.aspx?C=69b1RzNTDwem3wbm4pLRmuYfTLt16YjcghtEpZBsF5Sebx78I2DUCA..&URL=http%3a%2f%2faccess.ecs.soton.ac.uk%2f>
UK AAATE rep http://www.aaate.net/<https://www.outlook.soton.ac.uk/owa/redir.aspx?C=WUwOCw_4FszLSzcUbkoFdDkad8-Q_GrRfPYUJ_ol5l2ebx78I2DUCA..&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aaate.net%2f>

From: Bruce Bailey [mailto:Bailey@Access-Board.gov]
Sent: 22 October 2018 12:40
To: AG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; Shawn Lauriat <lauriat@google.com>; Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
Cc: 'Andrew Kirkpatrick' <akirkpat@adobe.com>; Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>; Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>; Katherine Eng <eng@access-board.gov>
Subject: RE: Silver Links for TPAC

Great presentation, thank you Jeanne and Shawn!

Also, I will mention that participation was better than I could have hoped for.  Thank you for all the work that went into that!

Regrets for tomorrow.  In terms of the “Next Normative Work”, personally I would be in favor prioritizing Silver, and the anticipated schedule seems like it would fit any future update to 508.

I have no objections to working on 2.2 either.  I would still like to see a “feature complete” version in the 2.x line (which we cannot get to with fiddling some of the normative bits of 2.0), but after this morning presentations, that now seems unnecessary to me.

--
Bruce Bailey
Accessibility IT Specialist
U.S. Access Board
1331 F Street NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC  20004-1111
202-272-0024 (voice)
508@access-board.gov<mailto:508@access-board.gov>

Thank you for your questions concerning section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998.  Section 508 authorizes the Access Board to provide technical assistance to individuals and Federal departments and agencies concerning the requirements of this section.  Technical assistance provided in this email is intended solely as informal guidance; it is neither a determination of your legal rights or responsibilities, nor a statement of the official views of the U.S. Access Board or any other federal agency.  Any links to non-federal websites are provided as a courtesy and do not represent an endorsement of the linked information, products, or services.

From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com<mailto:jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 10:17 AM
To: AG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>; Shawn Lauriat <lauriat@google.com<mailto:lauriat@google.com>>
Subject: Silver Links for TPAC

Silver group is working on prototypes to show for TPAC.   The prototypes are still separate so they are easier to  perform testing with stakeholders.  Since AGWG is a stakeholder for Silver, we will do some usability testing with AGWG.

Information Architecture:

Silver proposes to flatten the WCAG architecture into Guidelines and Methods.  We will review in detail what happens to all the WCAG architecture on Monday at TPAC, but generally, most existing SC will move to Guidelines and Techniques will move to Methods. There is a lot of detail that we have worked out, but please wait for the presentation on Monday before commenting.  There is a tagging engine that will connect the guidelines and methods that will also help with filtering and searching.  It is database driven.  It currently has lorem ipsum dummy information, so that evaluators focus on the structure and not the content.

This prototype's  database is running on a server that is only designed for individual traffic, so be patient with it.  We plan to move to the Silver Github repo by TPAC.

https://mikecrabb.github.io/silver_taggingSystemDemo/<https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmikecrabb.github.io%2Fsilver_taggingSystemDemo%2F&data=01%7C01%7Cead%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C224350183c914f2441b008d63813596b%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C1&sdata=%2FMREmsTwHiPWR%2BZe6UQqGvnTxdv9nFXKIuf2rmdWyIA%3D&reserved=0>

Plain Language:

This is a simple prototype of what an existing success criterion of WCAG 2.1 could look like if moved to Silver and written in plain language.  It also includes what could be considered the Silver equivalent of the Understanding document.  Today, there are is a template with the structure of the guidance (for those who want a quick glance) and a sample that is filled out with most of the information for 2.4.10 Section Headings.
https://w3c.github.io/silver/prototypes/PlainLanguage2/index.html<https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fsilver%2Fprototypes%2FPlainLanguage2%2Findex.html&data=01%7C01%7Cead%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C224350183c914f2441b008d63813596b%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C1&sdata=gtDhYlC4tVYGQNWEIYW8msKzZzB7ncB75G83an94g1Y%3D&reserved=0>
https://w3c.github.io/silver/prototypes/PlainLanguage2/SectionHeading.html<https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fsilver%2Fprototypes%2FPlainLanguage2%2FSectionHeading.html&data=01%7C01%7Cead%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C224350183c914f2441b008d63813596b%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C1&sdata=K4qbIQSQ%2F%2Ba1KzFcF2oEUzm3EivSU4SeqiZHAfWN%2F0Q%3D&reserved=0>