- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:35:57 -0700
- To: GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJeQ8SAdFgpe8-PRR622YY6enN42=+j2P3gHfLLQoVQTSRQC5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Group, Right now icon fonts are the only barrier to replacing the author's font. The text width problem that was anticipated earlier has not materialized to be a problem. So, I am hoping this can be a best practice with strong encouragement. It really is a total misuse of semantics. People use text element tags like <i> and <span> to carry pictures. This would be innocuous if these were not targets of font change. The <i> is important to low vision because it changes the way font looks in a bad way. <span> is important because it has no natural semantics. If this problem was solved the issue of changing font could be addressed with font-family style, but without use of role an extension approach is needed. Then the at can only guess. Does class contain a particular set of values? Is the included text one character long? A font analyzer has now unambiguous way to separate text for font replacement and pictures disguised as text to leave alone. I need some help, if I am to automate stylesheet selection for non-experts. Best, Wayne
Received on Monday, 8 October 2018 17:36:55 UTC