RE: Proposed editorial errata for WCAG 2.1

+1

From: Michael Cooper [mailto:cooper@w3.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 12:48 PM
To: AG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Proposed editorial errata for WCAG 2.1


Based on recent changes in the editors' draft, I would add the following to the editorial errata in https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/errata/ if approved by the WG:

  *   In the Introduction<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#intro>, several (but not all) references to "WCAG 2.0" should be "WCAG 2.1".
  *   In the 0.5.2 Numbering in WCAG 2.1<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#numbering-in-wcag-2-1>, the words "critera" and "ccriteria" should be "criteria".
  *   In Success Criterion 1.4.10 Reflow<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#reflow>, the first note had a supernumary "Note" indicator which should be removed.
  *   In 5.3.1 Required Components of a Conformance Claim<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#conformance-required> the editorial note "In WCAG 2.0 this was a dated URI, which may need to be adjusted when this becomes a Rec." should be removed.
  *   In the definition for keyboard interface<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-keyboard-interface>, the second (of three) note should be an example of the first note, leaving only two actual notes.
  *   In the definition for technology<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-technologies>, the third note should instead be an example.
  *   In 7. Input Purposes for User Interface Components<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#input-purposes>, the word "county" should be "country".

A diff of the changes between the Rec version and current editors' draft, showing these changes, can be seen at https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.w3.org%2Fspec-generator%2F%3Ftype%3Drespec%26url%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2F21e2c0578b7512b051baea0b24c924e324fb23d4%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.w3.org%2Fspec-generator%2F%3Ftype%3Drespec%26url%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fd4dcc48d176aa33db1c6bee66e0e0188c5acb114%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html.

Michael