Re: Proposed editorial errata for WCAG 2.1

+1

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> wrote:

> Based on recent changes in the editors' draft, I would add the following
> to the editorial errata in https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/errata/ if
> approved by the WG:
>
>    - In the Introduction <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#intro>, several
>    (but not all) references to "WCAG 2.0" should be "WCAG 2.1".
>    - In the 0.5.2 Numbering in WCAG 2.1
>    <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#numbering-in-wcag-2-1>, the words
>    "critera" and "ccriteria" should be "criteria".
>    - In Success Criterion 1.4.10 Reflow
>    <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#reflow>, the first note had a
>    supernumary "Note" indicator which should be removed.
>    - In 5.3.1 Required Components of a Conformance Claim
>    <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#conformance-required> the editorial
>    note "In WCAG 2.0 this was a dated URI, which may need to be adjusted when
>    this becomes a Rec." should be removed.
>    - In the definition for keyboard interface
>    <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-keyboard-interface>, the second (of
>    three) note should be an example of the first note, leaving only two actual
>    notes.
>    - In the definition for technology
>    <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-technologies>, the third note
>    should instead be an example.
>    - In 7. Input Purposes for User Interface Components
>    <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#input-purposes>, the word "county"
>    should be "country".
>
> A diff of the changes between the Rec version and current editors' draft,
> showing these changes, can be seen at https://services.w3.org/
> htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.w3.org%2Fspec-
> generator%2F%3Ftype%3Drespec%26url%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Frawgit.
> com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2F21e2c0578b7512b051baea0b24c924e324fb23d4%2Fguidelines%
> 2Findex.html&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.w3.org%2Fspec-
> generator%2F%3Ftype%3Drespec%26url%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Frawgit.
> com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fd4dcc48d176aa33db1c6bee66e0e0188c5acb114%2Fguidelines%
> 2Findex.html.
> Michael
>
>