Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is

+1 
...just to end this discussion - but I see from many -1s that it seems set to drag on and eat more of our most precious resource, time. 
I thought it was clear that in the absence of a new SC layout in Silver and the need to keep 2.0 SCs as is, we were content with a less then perfect structure for the time being. 
For practical purposes of conforming and testing conformance, it makes no difference where exactly 1.3.4 is housed.
There is so much to be done regarding Techniques and Understanding docs that I dearly hope the effort would go there rather than into continuing this drawn-out SC position squabble. Let‘s move on!
Detlev

Sent from phone

> Am 15.03.2018 um 15:26 schrieb Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>:
> 
> Call For Consensus — ends Monday March 19th at 11:00am Boston time.
>  
> The Working Group has discussed a change which would move SC 1.3.4 Identify Common Controls to Guideline 3.3. This CFC is to evaluate the apparent consensus to not move the SC. On the WG call there was a lower level of support to move the SC than to not move it.
>   
> Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2018/03/13-ag-minutes.html#item02
>  
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.
>  
> Thanks,
> AWK
>  
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe 
>  
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>  
>