HiUnfortunate if we do not stop this way of thinking now, we will just repeat the mistakes with 2.2 etc. WCAG 1.0 was criticized for lack of inclusion of people with learning and cognitive disabilities. The same happened with 2.0. At some point we have to say we are stopping to publish specifications that do not represent people with disabilities equally. It is only then that we might solve this problem. That is my 2 cents anyway... All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 00:34:49 +0200 Léonie Watson<tink@tink.uk> wrote ---- On 26/01/2018 20:47, Abma, J.D. (Jake) wrote: > It would be interesting to see where possibilities for change lie from within the W3C. > Personally I don't think more time is the key here, three years is way too long. The minimum amount of time to go from FPWD to Recommendation is six months (174 days to be precise). It depends on everything going smoothly of course, but it can be done. It takes a fundamental change in work mode to do it though. With HTML, we went from 15 years between HTML4.1 and HTML5, to a roughly 12 month cycle for 5.1, 5.2, and now 5.3. We had to change quite a lot to enable this though, and of course those same things might not be as suitable for this WG as they were for WebPlat. Léonie.
Received on Sunday, 28 January 2018 16:34:03 UTC