Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options)


Respectfully, we are. We have a choice. We are only out of time because the
majority seriously thought we would be ready, and if we weren't, well there
is 2.2. However, the number of meaningful, ready to go SCs are so low as to
be almost meaningless. And releasing an SC that we will 'fix' in the next
iteration, makes no sense to me.

It is not an easy choice, but it is a choice - to say - it is not ready.

Please do not misconstrue my intentions, my comments are not about taking
shots at anyone. Of course everyone has done their best, and many
heroically at that - but that fact is - we are not ready.

The path doesn't need to be my suggestion, it is just one idea.

** katie **

Katie Haritos-Shea

Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA)


People may forget exactly what it was that you said or did,
but people will never forget how you made them feel.......

Our scars remind us of where we have been........they do not have to
dictate where we are going.

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Joshue O Connor - InterAccess <> wrote:

> White, Jason J wrote:
> +1 to Katie’s comments. I am particularly concerned by the trade-off that
> favours timeliness over quality,
> Just for the record *no-one* is trading timelines over quality - we just
> happen to be out of time.
> --
> Joshue O Connor
> Director |

Received on Thursday, 18 January 2018 16:35:14 UTC