Josh, Respectfully, we are. We have a choice. We are only out of time because the majority seriously thought we would be ready, and if we weren't, well there is 2.2. However, the number of meaningful, ready to go SCs are so low as to be almost meaningless. And releasing an SC that we will 'fix' in the next iteration, makes no sense to me. It is not an easy choice, but it is a choice - to say - it is not ready. Please do not misconstrue my intentions, my comments are not about taking shots at anyone. Of course everyone has done their best, and many heroically at that - but that fact is - we are not ready. The path doesn't need to be my suggestion, it is just one idea. ** katie ** Katie Haritos-Shea Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA) 703-371-5545 ryladog@gmail.com People may forget exactly what it was that you said or did, but people will never forget how you made them feel....... Our scars remind us of where we have been........they do not have to dictate where we are going. On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Joshue O Connor - InterAccess < josh@interaccess.ie> wrote: > White, Jason J wrote: > > +1 to Katie’s comments. I am particularly concerned by the trade-off that > favours timeliness over quality, > > Just for the record *no-one* is trading timelines over quality - we just > happen to be out of time. > > -- > Joshue O Connor > Director | InterAccess.ie >
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2018 16:35:14 UTC