>On 17/01/2018 09:23, Detlev Fischer (TK) wrote: >>Hi Patrick, >> >>I guess you meant to say >> >>"UNLESS the user has a mechanism to zoom, the following must be true" >> >>...or (which is the same thing essentially) >> >>"IF the user doesn't have a mechanism to zoom, the following must be >>true" >> >>Correct? > >Yes, got wrapped up in an unintententional double negative there. > >>I think adding this exception would largely pull the rug from under >>this SC since nearly all UA (or mobile OS, in their accessibility >>settings) allow some form of zoom - so you would have a SC which you >>can in most cases ignore (or which would have as only technique for >>authors something like "Do not prevent the user from zooming by >>setting meta name=viewport maximum-scale=1", or similar). > >You saw through my evil plan, yes. Alles klar :-) > > >P >-- Patrick H. Lauke > >www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke >http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com >twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke >Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2018 12:40:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:21 UTC