- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:16:04 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
We started with motion & scaling animations, that got changed to the general animations (intentionally, to cover more aspects):
https://www.w3.org/2017/12/21-ag-minutes.html#item05
Accepted Jan 3rd:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2018JanMar/0029.html
I’d be happy emphasising motion-type animations in the definition without excluding others, but it seems the choice is either:
- Undo the previous decision, or
- Widen the explicit scope of the definition.
-Alastair
On 16/01/2018, 08:06, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:
In that case:
-1 this definition only mentions movement/size, whereas animation as a
concept (particularly in web design/development) cover a wide range of
changes (including "color animation", "opacity animation", etc). Either
the definition needs to make it clear that it's taking a subset and only
considering movement/size, OR the definition needs to encompass all
forms of animation and the SC needs to then be scoped to only cover
"motion animation" or similar.
P
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2018 10:16:34 UTC