Re[2]: What can I do, you may ask?

------ Original Message ------
From: "Abma, J.D. (Jake)" <Jake.Abma@ing.nl>
To: "'Glenda Sims'" <glenda.sims@deque.com>; "Alastair Campbell" 
<acampbell@nomensa.com>
[...]
>My two cents…
>
>
>1. Graphics and User Interface Components Contrast” (Too long?)
>=> Don’t think “too long” is a good enough reason not to be fully clear 
>on what we’re trying to express
>

+1 to adding User interface components to this SC title, as it gives a 
much clearer overview of what the SC is about.

Thanks

Josh

>
>
>1. “Graphics and Component Contrast”
>=> we use and have a definition for the term UIC (User Interface 
>Component) so if we mean that term, we should use it, otherwise what do 
>we mean with “Component” as stand-alone term? may cause 
>incomprehensibility.
>
>
>1. “Non-Text Contrast”
>
>=> This is an interesting one…!!! Not sure how it’s done all over the 
>world BUT 1.1.1 is used by the Accessibility Foundation (and I’ve seen 
>others do the same) to fail non-tagged PDF’s. As PDFs are PostScript 
>like files they’re seen as Non-Text content. Using the term “Non-Text 
>Contrast” and applying it to the text of the PDF is technically 
>explainable but also odd.
>
>For these reasons I lean towards 1) Graphics and User Interface 
>Components Contrast”
>
>From: Glenda Sims [mailto:glenda.sims@deque.com]
>Sent: maandag 15 januari 2018 22:22
>To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
>Cc: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>Subject: Re: What can I do, you may ask?
>
>Alastair,
>
>
>1. Graphics and User Interface Components Contrast” (Too long?)
>2. “Graphics and Component Contrast”
>3. “Non-Text Contrast”
>
>I could live with any of these. To be in harmony with WCAG 2.0...I lean 
>toward 3) "Non-Text Contrast".
>
>G
>
>glenda sims | team a11y lead | deque.com<http://deque.com> | 
>512.963.3773
>*web for everyone. web on everything.* - w3 goals
>
>[IAAP International Association of Accessibility Professionals: 
>Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Competencies 
>(CPACC)]<http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification>
>
>
>
>On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 4:16 AM, Alastair Campbell 
><acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>> wrote:
>I’ve drafted these:
>282
>411
>649
>680
>686
>
>For 616, it is about the title of “Graphics contrast” not covering UI 
>components.
>Alternative suggestions are:
>
>
>1. “Graphics and User Interface Components Contrast” (Too long?)
>2. “Graphics and Component Contrast”
>3. “Non-Text Contrast”
>
>Any preference? I lean towards 2, but could live with 3.
>
>-Alastair
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>ATTENTION:
>The information in this e-mail is confidential and only meant for the 
>intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, don't use or 
>disclose it in any way. Please let the sender know and delete the 
>message immediately.
>-----------------------------------------------------------------