I agree with "non text contrast"
Cheers,
David MacDonald
*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel: 613.235.4902
LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
twitter.com/davidmacd
GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
* Adapting the web to all users*
* Including those with disabilities*
If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:
> Ok, that got the most votes.
>
>
>
> I’ve updated the response to 616, I’ll put in a change request.
>
>
>
> It is a bit wide for what it covers, but actually less so than the WCAG
> 2.0 one.
>
>
>
> I’d love to change the title of 1.4.3 to “Text contrast”, but I won’t
> raise an issue 😉
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Glenda Sims
>
>
>
> I could live with any of these. To be in harmony with WCAG 2.0...I lean
> toward 3) "Non-Text Contrast".
>
>
>
> G
>
>
>
>