W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2018

Re: What can I do, you may ask?

From: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 15:22:15 -0600
Message-ID: <CAH2ngERKE-GHnDe6Ca1esU_o3mn8e=D+MCSTNeCAwi6f_p9GOw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Cc: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Alastair,


   1. Graphics and User Interface Components Contrast” (Too long?)
   2. “Graphics and Component Contrast”
   3. “Non-Text Contrast”


I could live with any of these.  To be in harmony with WCAG 2.0...I lean
toward 3)  "Non-Text Contrast".

G

glenda sims  |   team a11y lead   |    deque.com    |    512.963.3773
*web for everyone. web on everything.* -  w3 goals

[image: IAAP International Association of Accessibility Professionals:
Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Competencies (CPACC)]
<http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification>




On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 4:16 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> I’ve drafted these:
>
> 282
>
> 411
>
> 649
>
> 680
>
> 686
>
>
>
> For 616, it is about the title of “Graphics contrast” not covering UI
> components.
>
> Alternative suggestions are:
>
>
>
>    1. “Graphics and User Interface Components Contrast” (Too long?)
>    2. “Graphics and Component Contrast”
>    3. “Non-Text Contrast”
>
>
>
> Any preference? I lean towards 2, but could live with 3.
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
Received on Monday, 15 January 2018 21:22:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:21 UTC