- From: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 15:22:15 -0600
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 15 January 2018 21:22:38 UTC
Alastair, 1. Graphics and User Interface Components Contrast” (Too long?) 2. “Graphics and Component Contrast” 3. “Non-Text Contrast” I could live with any of these. To be in harmony with WCAG 2.0...I lean toward 3) "Non-Text Contrast". G glenda sims | team a11y lead | deque.com | 512.963.3773 *web for everyone. web on everything.* - w3 goals [image: IAAP International Association of Accessibility Professionals: Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Competencies (CPACC)] <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 4:16 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > I’ve drafted these: > > 282 > > 411 > > 649 > > 680 > > 686 > > > > For 616, it is about the title of “Graphics contrast” not covering UI > components. > > Alternative suggestions are: > > > > 1. “Graphics and User Interface Components Contrast” (Too long?) > 2. “Graphics and Component Contrast” > 3. “Non-Text Contrast” > > > > Any preference? I lean towards 2, but could live with 3. > > > > -Alastair >
Received on Monday, 15 January 2018 21:22:38 UTC