Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions

+1


On 15/01/2018 10:22, Alastair Campbell wrote:
> +1
> 
> *From: *Andrew Kirkpatrick
> 
> Call For Consensus — ends Tuesday January 16th at 11:59pm Boston time.
> 
> This CFC is a proposal to add a definition for “Animation”:
> 
> The changes to the SC are implemented in this pull request: 
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/727
> 
> The new definition is:
> 
> Animation:
> 
> addition of steps between states to create the illusion of movement 
> and/or to give a sense of movement.
> 
> For example, an element which appears instantly in one frame is not 
> using animation. An element which moves into place or changes size while 
> appearing is considered to be animated.
> 
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have 
> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you 
> “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know 
> before the CfC deadline.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> AWK
> 
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> 
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> 
> Adobe
> 
> akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
> 
> http://twitter.com/awkawk 
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0>
> 

-- 
@LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe Carpe diem

Received on Monday, 15 January 2018 10:49:47 UTC