RE: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions

+1

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
Sent: maandag 15 januari 2018 6:13
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions
Importance: High

Call For Consensus — ends Tuesday January 16th at 11:59pm Boston time.

This CFC is a proposal to add a definition for “Animation”:

The changes to the SC are implemented in this pull request: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/727


The new definition is:
Animation:
addition of steps between states to create the illusion of movement and/or to give a sense of movement.
For example, an element which appears instantly in one frame is not using animation. An element which moves into place or changes size while appearing is considered to be animated.

If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0>



-----------------------------------------------------------------
ATTENTION:
The information in this e-mail is confidential and only meant for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, don't use or disclose it in any way. Please let the sender know and delete the message immediately.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Monday, 15 January 2018 11:51:59 UTC