Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589

Lisa,
I could have made this one clearer if I hadn’t forgotten to provide the direct link to the response. It is available in the minutes which are linked, but I usually post it in the email. I have below:

Issue title: 589: “Understanding document Zoom Content / Reflow Content“
Link to response: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#589


Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: "lisa.seeman@zoho.com" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 10:46
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589

Objection due to the cfc being unclear
All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fil.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Flisaseeman%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C261721f0c5d44217853108d55b66067f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636515416113806572&sdata=4pUPIhGg%2B92kJ6lMY3fo0ykg%2FnVxpFyTJnODoN01hKE%3D&reserved=0>, Twitter<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FSeemanLisa&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C261721f0c5d44217853108d55b66067f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636515416113806572&sdata=QgGluQZZcquLPg4IfFUMD3swwToFmL5mr%2FfOvIAEFRc%3D&reserved=0>



---- On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 21:54:20 +0200 Laura Carlson<laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote ----
+1

Kindest Regards,
Laura

On Jan 11, 2018 12:44 PM, "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>> wrote:
Call For Consensus — ends January 15 at 1:30pm Boston time.

The Working Group has discussed a response to issue 589 (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/589<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fissues%2F589&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C261721f0c5d44217853108d55b66067f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636515416113806572&sdata=IIKSiFxZ4Aj35uMox6LwJ%2FnI4IzRU4AcTiGM7ZU3ZhI%3D&reserved=0>) and discussion. This was discussed on the call (https://www.w3.org/2018/01/11-ag-minutes.html#item07<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2018%2F01%2F11-ag-minutes.html%23item07&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C261721f0c5d44217853108d55b66067f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636515416113806572&sdata=no0RwSAWI1x0IGZLkHcPOFb3xqJu4u5qskVW8%2FWLF50%3D&reserved=0>).

If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0