RE: Guideline 2.6 text

No, I was referring to the success criterion, not the proposed guideline text.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Detlev Fischer [mailto:detlev.fischer@testkreis.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 9:16 AM
> To: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
> Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Guideline 2.6 text
>
> Hi Jason,
> You write at the end of your mail:
>
> > Thus, it seems there is some value to be gained by the proposal as currently
> formulated.
> >
> Just to clarify: Do you mean the 10th January editor’s draft, i.e., the sentence
> “Make appropriate use of device sensor information” that Andrew proposed?
>
> I take your points, but still think this is too vague: ‘appropriate use’ is not a clear
> guidance.
>
> Detlev
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is
> intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error,
> please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in
> reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any
> other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
> >
> >
> > Thank you for your compliance.
> >
> > ________________________________


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________

Received on Wednesday, 10 January 2018 14:29:54 UTC