W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2018

Has any progress been made on making gitHub Issues to conform with WCAG 2.1 Reflow?

From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:34:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJeQ8SDAFrkJbruxD9HCYVLVEhh4-cxbrgNgSaOgen5Zwr-pyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Dear Michael,
Have we taken any steps to push gitHub toward meeting the Reflow criterion.
The issues that are used as the primary means of communication are not
accessible. It would be nice to let interested members with low vision

We have developed and approved guidelines that include Reflow up to 320 CSS
pixels. We did this because reflow was deemed to be essential and doable by
web designers. I think we should use tools that support low vision so that
members of the w3 with low vision can participate.

Have we written a letter? Have we communicated the problem to GitHub in any

Best, Wayne
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2018 18:35:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:26 UTC