- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:47:37 -0400
- To: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Cc: Joshue O Connor - InterAccess <josh@interaccess.ie>, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>, Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDbDvG-VGKoL47e4V9nENBVQBFVp=xAqZ2E+JhsNMmGihA@mail.gmail.com>
> I fail to see how a primary target audience for any given SC should somehow soften or weaken the SC. I'm not suggesting we soften it, I'm suggesting we don't widen it. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:34 AM, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> wrote: > > This SC is aimed at improving the experience for low vision users, the > focus indicator is generally for keyboard users. > > And...? > > I fail to see how a primary target audience for any given SC should > somehow soften or weaken the SC. I'll respond to that statement with: > > *This SC is aimed at improving the experience for users, and the focus > indicator is generally for those users who require it. * > > https://www.w3.org/WAI/perspective-videos/contrast/ - "...essential for > people with disabilities and useful for all." > > JF > > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:24 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> > wrote: > >> > ... IMO within the twin cultures of MVP and minimum compliance without >> the push of that 30% nothing more would be done. >> >> I hope that proves to be true. History will tell ... In the meantime, I >> suggest we not get too strident in the interpretation of our new SCs, until >> we see what happens with what we've put out there. We >> ​ say in our standard​ >> "The Working Group considers that WCAG 2.1 incrementally advances web >> content accessibility guidance for all these areas..." >> >> Let's keep it "incremental" ... >> >> >> Cheers, >> David MacDonald >> >> >> >> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* >> >> Tel: 613.235.4902 >> >> LinkedIn >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> >> >> twitter.com/davidmacd >> >> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> >> >> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> >> >> >> >> * Adapting the web to all users* >> * Including those with disabilities* >> >> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy >> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> >> >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:03 AM, Joshue O Connor - InterAccess < >> josh@interaccess.ie> wrote: >> >>> David MacDonald wrote: >>> >>> These fast implementation cycles are based on the AGILE world... and in >>> the AGILE world we also have Minimal Viable product (MVP) delivery which >>> I'd say we've overstepped a bit with a 30% increase with this version. >>> Let's not widen it further right now. >>> >>> While I hear your point, I don't think we have overstepped at all. IMO >>> within the twin cultures of MVP and minimum compliance without the push >>> of that 30% nothing more would be done. >>> >>> -- >>> Joshue O Connor >>> Director | InterAccess.ie >>> >> >> > > > -- > John Foliot > Principal Accessibility Strategist > Deque Systems Inc. > john.foliot@deque.com > > Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion >
Received on Friday, 22 June 2018 13:48:08 UTC