- From: Chuck Adams <charles.adams@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 07:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <bafc29a0-e672-4d83-8df6-30858c52f29d@default>
This is an interesting approach of circumventing our stated goal of making 2.1 backwards compatible (and keeping 2.0 whole and unchanged). I appreciate the effort of pushing adoption of 2.1, but IMHO this doesn’t really serve the cause of either 2.0 or 2.1. Not sure what our response could/should be, but I would like to see us offer up some kind of message in which we explicitly discourage cramming 2.1 SC into 2.0 standards. Regards, Charles Adams From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 8:35 AM To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> Cc: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: Re: Someone has mapped WCAG 2.1 back to WCAG 2.0 It looks like he's trying to find a way to evaluate sites for 2.1 conformance under the 508 which only requires WCAG 2.0... so he's saying failures that would normally map to our new 2.1 SCs, can be mapped to existing 2.0 SCs in the table... Kind of bizarre and weird... Cheers, David MacDonald CanAdapt Solutions Inc. Tel: 613.235.4902 HYPERLINK "https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_davidmacdonald100&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=b-9TIC95K-nLEKIDibNXAN_FKV-iXhLlAW2Zc3ebV_c&m=AQNpoI3q8-C3wMf61CEbCAFdRa2Som47oMW67-bzPq4&s=qtHI_mWeDTRAdFxwy5C3aSmguluzLJz31Y7FwkVIWnE&e="LinkedIn HYPERLINK "https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_davidmacd&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=b-9TIC95K-nLEKIDibNXAN_FKV-iXhLlAW2Zc3ebV_c&m=AQNpoI3q8-C3wMf61CEbCAFdRa2Som47oMW67-bzPq4&s=v7VQrQg1r6tikXsdfJGaNRjW7rqvbJr1qMnZ0URI6-E&e="twitter.com/davidmacd HYPERLINK "https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_DavidMacDonald&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=b-9TIC95K-nLEKIDibNXAN_FKV-iXhLlAW2Zc3ebV_c&m=AQNpoI3q8-C3wMf61CEbCAFdRa2Som47oMW67-bzPq4&s=d5l2o9Da6N1QdxDmC2hQ_6iEybEFZenmXiRwmQzGz_Y&e="GitHub HYPERLINK "https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.can-2Dadapt.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=b-9TIC95K-nLEKIDibNXAN_FKV-iXhLlAW2Zc3ebV_c&m=AQNpoI3q8-C3wMf61CEbCAFdRa2Som47oMW67-bzPq4&s=cQmtMsyVAPkfTGmpnZR1Mb9tQtQdEXMBIKgngnM1P7o&e="www.Can-Adapt.com Adapting the web to all users Including those with disabilities If you are not the intended recipient, please review our HYPERLINK "https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.davidmacd.com_disclaimer.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=b-9TIC95K-nLEKIDibNXAN_FKV-iXhLlAW2Zc3ebV_c&m=AQNpoI3q8-C3wMf61CEbCAFdRa2Som47oMW67-bzPq4&s=E00oyfqFdVcFbG9UgjaGv-xwk5FcqsFjMI0agYvi21g&e="privacy policy On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <HYPERLINK "mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com"akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: Jon, Thanks for sharing this. Am I misreading it or is the author suggesting that the 2.1 SC are replacing 2.0 SC? Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe HYPERLINK "mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com"akirkpat@adobe.com HYPERLINK "https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_awkawk&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=b-9TIC95K-nLEKIDibNXAN_FKV-iXhLlAW2Zc3ebV_c&m=AQNpoI3q8-C3wMf61CEbCAFdRa2Som47oMW67-bzPq4&s=SRDDxKFbt8ybzld-MvwInfJQulzXPRA50R9yGzzduO4&e="http://twitter.com/awkawk From: Jonathan Avila <HYPERLINK "mailto:jon.avila@levelaccess.com"jon.avila@levelaccess.com> Date: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 09:36 To: WCAG <HYPERLINK "mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: Someone has mapped WCAG 2.1 back to WCAG 2.0 Resent-From: WCAG <HYPERLINK "mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Resent-Date: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 09:35 As an FYI – I think the group should be aware of this. HYPERLINK "https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fwww.linkedin.com-252Fpulse-252Fretrograde-2Dremapping-2Dwcag-2D21-2Dlevel-2Daa-2Dsuccess-2Dcriteria-2Dnewton-252F-26data-3D02-257C01-257Cakirkpat-2540adobe.com-257C010fcbb69e484cf41aea08d5d6b2d652-257Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1-257C0-257C0-257C636650985960200402-26sdata-3DEmJo5ZTc-252BiRwAH0-252BQxJTt6I5s8EX9IPQ6Iyb5Eydn0M-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=b-9TIC95K-nLEKIDibNXAN_FKV-iXhLlAW2Zc3ebV_c&m=AQNpoI3q8-C3wMf61CEbCAFdRa2Som47oMW67-bzPq4&s=X8C-Qi3OYTRBYQuMYwqsA6dJeX29skLCaFu3rzMG5Gs&e="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/retrograde-remapping-wcag-21-level-aa-success-criteria-newton/ Jonathan
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2018 14:46:03 UTC