- From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 14:03:20 -0500
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, WCAG group <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, LVTF - low-vision-a11y <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKdCpxwHjyaTZdwryW-Gg5hxxe-DTRh=AEwa0xxdzjxcTuVrPg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Laura, > But the big question is: Is it an author's responsibility to solve a user agent issue? I suspect that very much depends on how you define "responsibility". If you are talking about "legal" responsibility, I'll side with the exception language, as I agree it truly is the user-agent at "fault" here. That said, in our Understanding documents we should be sufficiently transparent to note that while this *is* a currently known UA problem in some browsers (which may or may-not linger), it's a simple problem to fix, and for maximum "usability" and adherence to the spirit of WCAG content designers *should* address this known issue. My reasoning is that once designers "Understand" the problem, they can adjust to it quickly and easily, as the fix is quite simple: when you change one aspect of the design (background color) you are responsible for all of the other contrast changes that the initial change necessitates - that color choices are "paired" with contrast and visible state changes as well. In practice and observation during my multiple training activities, this does not appear to be a hard idea to grasp by the designers (in fact, on more than one occasion when discussing focus contrast, designers have brought this up to me first, as they begin to grok the issues related to visual design.) Thoughts? JF On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi John and all, > > On 6/13/18, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> wrote: > > > Any Mac users familiar with this: https://www.focusingly.net ? > > > > I wonder aloud if it addresses the problem we're discussing (Mac's > > inaccessible native focus ring). > > I think it could. > > But the big question is: Is it an author's responsibility to solve a > user agent issue? > > In the Hover SC discussions, I was told that it isn't an author's > responsibility. Rather, it is a Silver issue. > > With Marla Runyan's techniques [2], we had author title attribute > fixes for 1.4.13 too. But that didn't stop the User Agent exception > from going into 1.4.13. [1] > > Let's be consistent with how we handle the User Agent problem in SC > 1.4.13 and 1.4.11. If it is a Silver issue in one SC, it should be > Silver issue in both. > > Kindest Regards, > Laura > > [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2018AprJun/0712.html > [2] https://jsfiddle.net/obsqynyp/4/ > > -- > Laura L. Carlson > -- John Foliot Principal Accessibility Strategist Deque Systems Inc. john.foliot@deque.com Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2018 19:03:47 UTC