- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 21:30:05 +0000
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- CC: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AM5PR0902MB2002B0D3B06D94E6E96A2010B9660@AM5PR0902MB2002.eurprd09.prod.outlook.>
Hi David, The technique used doesn’t really matter: The issue raise is a shared device, so if it works it doesn’t matter how it works. Someone else coming to the same device (assuming the same login & profile etc) would have access to that data. There is a lot more detail in the github thread, but I don’t think it’s a problem WCAG can (or should) solve, and the benefit out-weighs a (possible) downside. Cheers, -Alastair From: David MacDonald I'm wondering if we can provide a second set of techniques where using the programmatically determinable accname (<label for>, aria-label etc.) for common fields including: - First Name - Last Name - Middle Name - Address - Phone Number - etc... AT should be able to identify these common fields if they are labelled om a way that makes its purpose obvious. See this Twitter thread. https://twitter.com/davidmacd/status/1002848685997416448 Cheers, David MacDonald CanAdapt Solutions Inc. Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd<http://twitter.com/davidmacd> GitHub<https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com<http://www.can-adapt.com/> Adapting the web to all users Including those with disabilities If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>> wrote: Hi everyone (and particularly John & Lisa), I’d like to run a proposed response past the group before posting to github (and notifying the commenter before the group gets a chance to review). https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/948 I’d summarise the core issue as: using autocomplete/autofill could be an issue for privacy/security for people using shared devices (e.g. family computer), and autcomplete shouldn’t be proposed as a technique to fulfil it. You can read the back and forth on the thread, but I’m proposing the response is: The working group have considered the security and privacy aspects of this, and whilst it must be acknowledged there may be some circumstances in which a user would not want fields identified and auto-filled, the working group feel the benefits outweigh the risks. Mitigating factors include: - This is functionality that is already available in user-agents, and used by some websites already. - It is something that must be enabled within the user-account and browser of the device used. - People can use various privacy features if that is a requirement. Currently the autocomplete attribute (for autofill) is the best supported method, so that will be the first technique provided. Personally, I don’t see it as an issue, but I’d appreciate a review from others familiar with autocomplete. Kind regards, -Alastair
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2018 21:30:34 UTC