- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 00:10:28 -0400
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDZah+kGPSOPNFr29ZwoZzJccer_yf1TKPrsAF+mUfMCNQ@mail.gmail.com>
> How about if we include an editor’s note in the non-text contrast understanding document saying that there was a late-breaking change and that the understanding content would be updated in the next few days? I'd rather just strike the 2 paragraphs about hit area... that's going to cause a lot of confusion, The editor's note could raise alarms... We can get the finer points in the next couple of weeks. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: > How about if we include an editor’s note in the non-text contrast > understanding document saying that there was a late-breaking change and > that the understanding content would be updated in the next few days? > > > > Thanks, > > AWK > > > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > > Group Product Manager, Accessibility > > Adobe > > > > akirkpat@adobe.com > > http://twitter.com/awkawk > > *From: *Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 20:29 > *To: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject: *RE: CFC - Publish Understanding and Techniques documents with > WCAG 2.1 > *Resent-From: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 20:26 > > > > In my opinion – if the CFC on non-text contrast passes, we would need to > update the understanding for non-text contrast before publishing these. > Without that update publication of the understanding document would only > cause confusion. Without that information I can’t say plus one. > > > > Jonathan > > > > *From:* Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 30, 2018 3:57 PM > *To:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject:* CFC - Publish Understanding and Techniques documents with WCAG > 2.1 > *Importance:* High > > > > Call For Consensus — ends Friday June 1st at 3:30pm Boston time. > > > > The Working Group has discussed the publication of the Understanding > documents and republication of techniques in conjunction with the release > of WCAG 2.1 as a W3C Recommendation. The Understanding document is > understood to need to continue to evolve, but the view of the Working Group > is that the documents should be published at the same time as the WCAG 2.1 > Recommendation. This will be the first time that the Techniques and > Understanding documents will be published outside of the Technical Reports > space at the W3C, but this will also allow the Working Group to update the > documents on an ongoing basis rather than on a multiple-month schedule. > > > > The proposed consensus position is that these documents should be > published at the same time as the WCAG 2.1 Recommendation. > > > > Current editor’s draft for Understanding: https://w3c.github.io/wcag21/ > understanding/ > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fwcag21%2Funderstanding%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C8798b606da5144986fc408d5c68d825f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633233437302968&sdata=JwIrp2bEpn%2B2vMTiQTfHX4vkOwpuDWIWpq7P24MCYWc%3D&reserved=0> > > > > Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2018/05/29-ag-minutes.html#item02 > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2018%2F05%2F29-ag-minutes.html%23item02&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C8798b606da5144986fc408d5c68d825f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633233437302968&sdata=tZjpH%2BXr2RTIvAy1Y1UZ3APbtvShSh2SJTZ0wP%2BJJQQ%3D&reserved=0> > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before > the CfC deadline. > > > > Thanks, > > AWK > > > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > > Group Product Manager, Accessibility > > Adobe > > > > akirkpat@adobe.com > > http://twitter.com/awkawk > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0> > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2018 04:10:56 UTC